Pages

Monday, March 31, 2014

Difference between SQL SERVER 2000,2005,2008 and 2012

SQL SERVER 2000:
1.Query Analyser and Enterprise manager are separate.
2.No XML datatype is used.
3.We can create maximum of 65,535 databases.
4.Cant compress the tables and indexes.

5.Datetime datatype is used for both date and time.
6.No varchar(max) or varbinary(max) is available.
7.No table datatype is included.
8.No SSIS is included.
9.CMS (Cenntral Management Server) is not available.
10.PBM (Policy Based Management) is not available.
11.High Availability Clustering or Log Shipping require Enterprise Edition. Expensive hardware.
SQL SERVER 2005:
1.Both are combined as SSMS(Sql Server management Studio).
2.XML datatype is introduced.
3.We can create 2(pow(20))-1 databases.
4.Exception Handling
5.Varchar(Max) data type
6.DDL Triggers
7.DataBase Mirroring
8.RowNumber function for paging
9.Table fragmentation
10.Full Text Search
11.Bulk Copy Update
12.Cant encrypt the entire database.
13.Can Compress tables and indexes.(Introduced in 2005 SP2)
14.Datetime is used for both date and time.
15.Varchar(max) and varbinary(max) is used.
16.No table datatype is included.
17.SSIS is started using.
18.CMS is not available.
19.PBM is not available.

20. High Availability Clustering, Database Mirroring or Log Shipping available in Standard Edition. Database Mirroring can use cheap hardware. 

SQL SERVER 2008:
1.Both are combined as SSMS(Sql Server management Studio).
2.XML datatype is used.
3.We can create 2(pow(20))-1 databases.
4.Exception Handling
5.Varchar(Max) data type
6.DDL Triggers
7.DataBase Mirroring
8.RowNumber function for paging
9.Table fragmentation
10.Full Text Search
11.Bulk Copy Update
12.TDE (Transparent Data Encryption) to encrypt the entire database introduced in 2008.
13.Can compress tables and indexes.
14.Date and time are separately used for date and time datatype,spatial and timestamps with internal timezone is used.
15.Varchar(max) and varbinary(max) is used.
16.Table datatype introduced.
17.SSIS avails in this version.
18.Central Management Server(CMS) is Introduced.
19.Policy based management(PBM) server is Introduced.
20. Auditing - monitoring of data access.
21. Resource Governor. Restrict users or groups from consuming high levels or resources.
22. Activity monitor: consolidates this information by detailing running and recently executed processes, graphically.
23. Backup compression.


SQL Server 2008 to SQL Server R2• Backup compression is available in R2 standard (was only in Enterprise)
• SQL Server 2008 R2 Express Edition database size limit increased to 10 GB (from 4GB)
• PowerPivot for SharePoint introduced for loading, querying, and managing PowerPivot workbooks that you publish to a SharePoint 2010 server
• PowerPivot for Excel is used to assemble and create relationships in large amounts of data from different sources, and then use that data as the basis for PivotTables and other data visualization objects that support data analysis in Excel.
• Utility Explorer introduced for centralized management of managed SQL instances.
• Master Data Services introduced to manage master (reference) data and maintain an auditable record of that data as it changes over time.
• Enhanced security to prevent an authentication relay attack.


SQL SERVER 2012:




1.The SQL Server 2012 uses 48 bit precision for spatial
2.In SQL server 2012 has unlimited concurrent connections
3.By default it supports 15,000 partitions
4.Available new string functions CONCATE and FORMAT
5.Available new conversion  functions are PARSE ,TRY_CONVERT,TRY_PARSE
6.
Microsoft.SqlServer.Dac and Microsoft.SqlServer.Dac.Extensions are introduced to perform  operations on Packages.

SQL Server 2008R2 to 2012• Inclusion of Visual Studio 2010 (BI edition)
• AlwaysOn technology – allowing automatic replication and switching to mirrored database/server in the event of problems
• In most instances, the performance is 10 times faster than the predecessor (Microsoft claim)
• Buffer rate is high in SQL Server 2012 because of data compression.
• Data visualization tool is available in SQL Server 2012.This allows snapshots of data.
• Support for persistent computed columns and extra geographical approach is possible with spatial features in SQL Server 2012.
• Allows for warm Service Patch patching – meaning SQL or server does not have to be rebooted/restarted to apply patches
• New ‘Contained Databases’ feature allowing easier movement of database instances between servers
• New ‘ColumnStore’ indexes – which turn indexes 90 degrees in use (instead of one index per row, you get multiple column indexes per row which has a major impact on performance)
• New TRY_CONVERT T-SQL command, which will perform data type conversion, but will NULL rather than error where conversion fails.
• New OFFSET/FETCH command which allows automatic capture of pages of rows (like SELECT TOP 90 * from…, but gives a starting row number for the page)
• Redesign of SQL Server management studio – providing new features, better intellisense, new viewing tools and cleaner interface
• Custom user server roles – meaning you can define roles with specific access (such as BI data reader) and assign these custom roles to defined users (therefore faster user maintenance)
• New virtual Windows FileTable commands in T-SQL lets you manage a folder like a table of documents, but still have external control over the contents: UPDATE C:\Docs\*.* SET ReadOnly = 1 WHERE Author = ‘Bob’ AND Created < ’20100101′;)
• NEGATIVE – SQL Server Management Studio will no longer run on XP. Needs Windows Vista, 7 or 8.
• NEGATIVE – SQL Server is no longer licenced on server, but either CALS or Cores in server CPU which could increase costs for large user connection scenarios.
• NEGATIVE – AWE is no longer supported, meaning your SQL Server instance on x86 with 32GB of RAM is only going to be able to use 4GB. Note – SQL now designed to run on 64bit hardware.

During the CCTV / Access Management Software installation the mail Database is on SQL based. So you must know Difference between SQL SERVER 2000,2005,2008 and 2012.

Saturday, March 22, 2014

360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p Measure Up

360p
This is an Animoto video’s default resolution. The majority of YouTube and Hulu videos are displayed in 360p, so that’s about the video quality that 360 lines of resolution provides. This (as well as the 480p) is a great resolution for mobile devices since the mobile screen rarely has enough pixels or enough memory to support HD videos.

480p

640x480 (480p) is the resolution that almost every camera can shoot at, most digicams from the last two years shoot at least 480p. Although there are lower resolutions (typically for high speed video), 640x480 should really be the lowest resolution to consider. 640x480 is a pretty good resolution, its not HD but its the resolution of standard definition television (SDTV) and a good quality source at 480p can look pretty good. Most people will be happy with this resolution but those who love the idea of widescreen, high definition home movies will want to venture into the two HDTV options. A 480p video will play beautifully on both your laptop and desktop monitors, and though it isn’t quite HD, it is definitely good enough to view on that spiffy new flatscreen TV you just bought

How does 480p Measure Up?

§  480p vs 720p: 480p has 1/3 the resolution
§  480p vs 1080p: 480p has about 1/7 the resolution
§  Click on the full resolution sample and you'll see that a clean 480p image can be fantastic - DVD is after all "only" 480p
720p (1280x720)
1280x720 (720p) is the lowest of two HDTV resolutions. The ability for digital cameras to shoot high definition video started to pick up in 2009 and is now available on many cameras. 720p provides fantastic video quality that is perfect for large screen TVs and high definition home movies. An HD 720p Animoto video is crisp, sharp, and takes full advantage of any display you want to view it on

How does 720p Measure Up

§  720p vs 480p: 720p has 3X the resolution
§  720p vs 1080p: 720p has about 1/2 the resolution
§  720p is a fantastic high definition resolution to shoot at
 1080p (1920x1080)
1920x1080 (1080p) is the highest of two HDTV resolutions. 1080p is also known as Full HD and is very high resolution video. Because of it's extreme size it requires more storage space, faster computers to edit, more powerful camera processors and a very large TV to notice the difference. Currently 12 of 500 cameras released in the last 2 years shoot 1080p

How does 1080p Measure Up?

§  1080p vs 480p: 1080p has 7X the resolution
§  1080p vs 720p: 1080p has about 2X the resolution
§  1080p is a fantastic high definition resolution to shoot at
§  1080p is the pinnacle of HD quality - but more suited for pros and hard core enthusiasts.

High Definition Formats (I.E. HDTV):
720p - The Resolution is 1280x720 pixels, sent at 60 complete frames per second.
1080i - The Resolution is 1920x1080 pixels, sent at 60 interlaced frames per second or 30 complete frames per second.
1080p - The Resolution is 1920x1080 pixels, sent at 60 complete frames per second.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Negotiation Strategies

 Negotiation Strategies

Negotiation is a soft skill that is used to achieve a desired outcome between two or more parties. You have a vested interest in getting an outcome that’s favorable for you or your business, and you need to employ negotiation tactics to convince the other party that they should enter into an agreement with you. In the meantime, you need to show the other party that you can be trusted, are interested in listening to their concerns, and crafting a contract or agreement that works in favor of both parties.

Maximizing value: A good negotiation strategy enables both parties to maximize their value through the acquisition or integration of new sources of revenue that they didn't own previously. Achieving favorable outcomes: The overall goal of a negotiation strategy is to get as close to what you want as possible. But Mainly on Govt organisations & few Pvt body, they looking for L1 (Chipset one) Vendor to execute there work. Ultimate project not successfully handover.

Outline

Ø  Negotiation and Influencing Basics.

Ø  Negotiation Style.

Ø  Developing the Business Opportunity.

Ø  Progressing Negotiations.

Ø  From Agreed Terms to Binding Contract.

Ø  The Softer Side of Negotiation.

Take-Home Messages

Ø  Negotiation is participatory

Ø  Positional negotiation is not effective

Ø  Power in negotiation comes from preparation

Ø  Preparation is necessary prior to any interaction with the other party

Ø  Ninety percent of the negotiation process is done before the first meeting

Ø  Listening is probably your most important skill to develop

The Art of Effective Negotiation

“in good deal making, 90% of the real negotiation happens before you sit down to negotiate’” “effective negotiation is 90% attitude and 10% technique”

 ü  Know the opposite party

ü  Know your own organization

ü  Know yourself.

Definitions and Guidelines

·        Negotiation facilitates agreement when some of your interests are shared and some are opposed

·        Negotiation is the process of evolving communication to get from opposition to consensus, manage conflict and reach agreement

·        Negotiation principles apply as much to your internal team as they do to an outside party.

·        Negotiation and influencing skills are critical to getting the best deal, facilitating problem solving, gaining support and building co-operative relationships.

·        Negotiation is central to gaining agreement and exercising influence.

The ability to influence others and resolve conflict is at the core of successful business

·        Negotiation is an integrated process requiring: Effective communication

Development of consensus (internal & external)

Process Management

Influence building and relationship development

·        Success in negotiation depends on confidence

Confidence enables and arises from

a) careful advance planning to maximize options and

b) working creatively during the negotiations to optimize the outcome

·        Success is ultimately measured by the potential contribution of a deal to the bottom line of your portfolio

·        Sometimes the best deals are the ones not done!

Definition of Need

·        First know thyself

Establish effective lines of communication to key stakeholders in your organization

Build consensus on organization needs & strategy

Develop BD objectives and priorities

Establish criteria for Strategic Fit

·        Proactive Reviews

Forced ranking opportunity assessments

·        Reactive Reviews

Degree of fit with predefined criteria

Preparation: The Elevator Pitch

·        Your first assignment as a BD person

·        Template:

We provide (state the nature of your product/service)…

for (who is the target audience)…

… who want (what does this audience need)…

…and are looking for (what audience values).

Most people aren’t even aware that (what should they know but might not know to ask).

We always offer (case building, foundation for differentiation)

To help our audience make the best decisions possible, we offer _______________ which contains (evidence)

Negotiation Style - We All Have an Individual Style

·                  Style is a consistent pattern of behaviors emanating from an individual and recognised by others

·        Distinct negotiating styles Warm

a)   Tough

b)   Numbers

c)   Dealer

·        The role of style in negotiation enables us to understand and manage

a)   Ourselves

b)   Our internal team

c)   The opposite party

Negotiation Style - Character as the Basis of Negotiation Style

·        Style is influenced by innate character traits

·        Style can be fine-tuned to adapt to different negotiation scenarios - your fundamental character does not change

·        Complementary styles make a successful negotiating team - Adapting style can enhance and improve intra-team co-operation

Where Does Our Style Come From?

          Genetics

          Upbringing

          Social background

          Education and training

          National culture

          Reaction and response to other people

          Professional experience

No one fits exactly into one style, but most of us have a 60-80% fit with one

To recognize your style, you need to look inside and find out how others see you

Warm Style

Tough Style

Numbers Style

Dealer Style

Beyond style, all negotiators should…..

·                  Have the willingness to prepare

·                  Enter negotiations with optimism and ambition, projecting high expectation and self confidence

There is striking research evidence that people who expect more get more

·        Have commitment to integrity and courtesy

Even polar opposites are entitled to treatment with respect!

·        Develop proactive questioning and listening skills

Make best use of questions, body language, interjections

Develop supporting statements, clarifying statements & summarizing statements to elicit information and optimize communication

Develop Internal Consensus

·        Technical Review Team

·        With Project Owner (with operational responsibility)

·        With Alliance Manager (if not Project Owner)

·        Within Business Development Team

·        With Project Stakeholders

·        With Senior Management

Deal Team Concept

Establishment of Internal Corporate Objectives

·        Define strategic purpose of partnering

a.   Cash

b.   Pipeline gap

c.    Experience in pre-clinical or clinical development

d.   Meet commercialization goals

·        Define the market opportunity

a.   Elaborate commercial potential - be realistic, consult experts

b.   Understand competition, potential differentiators

c.    Develop financial model and understand sensitivity of key parameters; e.g. how changing the numbers changes the proportion of profit share between licensor and licensee

d.   Prepare strategic options as a decision tree and the financial implications of partnering at different development time-points

e.   Prepare a product life cycle plan

Align Objectives to Potential Partners

·        Is there one ideal partner for the opportunity?

a)   Based on e.g. Strategy, capabilities, industry reputation, therapeutic focus, deal-making history

b)   Synergies with your organization obvious

c)   Candidate for ‘Proactive Review’

d)   Approach to negotiation can be more targeted and customized to the ideal partner in question

·        Or are there potentially many contenders?

a)   e.g. Earlier stage assets requiring initial exploratory research phase

b)   More effort required in initial ‘finder’ phase, to identify partner with ideal strategic fit

c)   Candidate for ‘Reactive Review’

d)   Approach to negotiation initially more general (one size fits all) then customized once probable partner identified.

Maintaining Alignment to Internal Corporate Objectives

·        Create a communication plan within your company so the message is always the same

·        Establish and communicate criteria for identifying potential partners and their fit to your organization

·        Begin to define and structure the type of deal your organization is seeking Understand your Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA)

a)   Create a rough outline of a term sheet including ballpark figures for financial terms and trigger events for payments

b)   Analyze comparable deals.

c)   Reaffirm your BATNA in the context of your draft term sheet

·        Ensure the broad definition of the deal is communicated effectively internally Secure buy-in as early as possible in the process.

Visualize the Opportunity

Planning Tools

·                  Create a map of the issues – note what a change in one issue will do to another

·                  Set your limits

What is your BATNA? This will be the low end of your limit

What is their BATNA? Difficult to estimate, but very important

What is your target? Your target should be ambitious without being ludicrous. It should be near their BATNA.

·                  Set your first offer and ensure this is communicated to your key stakeholders internally Even if the other party offers the first term sheet, you must keep your first offer in mind

Examples of Negotiation Issues

·        License

·        Payments - Upfront, FTE support, success fees, milestones, royalties

·        Activities of the Parties: obligations vs. responsibilities

·        Other considerations (Quids?)

·        Manufacture and supply (Bulk / Formulation / Fill / Finish)

·        IP Inventorship / Prosecution / Enforcement

·        Registration Rights

·        Governance and Dispute Resolution

·        Representations and Warranties

·        Termination

Interdependence of the Issues

Planning Tools

·        Make a chart of what issues or terms you will give up, what you must keep, what you want to get, and what could be a surprise.

·        Create a chart of information that you will disclose to the other party, keep from the other party, want to get from the other party, and what would surprise you if they gave it to you.

Preparation for Initial Contact

·        Establish the objective for the initial contact

·        Have all your planning tools together and completed - Information needs, possible scenarios, etc.

·        Prepare your introduction statement

Envisaged relationship

Balance of power

Possible outcomes and probability of success

·        Determine who should be contacted and who should make the contacts. Agree on “one voice”

·        Make initial contact; assess and establish interest

·        Discuss and agree next steps

Transfer of non-confidential materials: have all relevant publications, patents, posters, etc ready in pdf form to send out upon request

Define and agree time frame for review and follow-up period to enable you to meet internal expectations

Building the Scientific Contact

·        Define what your organization requires to build the foundation of a full binding agreement with the party

Transfer of proprietary materials under an MTA?

More collaborative involvement in a predefined Feasibility Study?

·        Secure the necessary co-operation and buy in from your scientific and technical specialists Ensure your key individuals know their counterparts in the partner organization

Keep technical achievability aligned to strategic intent, even at this early stage

·        Work with your internal specialists to outline the workplan for this stage of the interaction

Bear in mind that all provisions (e.g. obligations, ownership of inventions, confidentiality, consequences of termination) must align with the intended terms of the eventual full agreement

Guiding Principles

·        Openly discuss needs and expectations of your organization

·        Invite other party to describe their needs and expectations

·        Establish agreement on scope & Key Success Factors which will guide decision-making in the project.

·        Codify into statement(s) that define the spirit as well as the intent of the desired relationship.

Overall Goal of Negotiation: to become the Preferred Partner

·        Partnership is a social as well as a legal contract Anticipate balance between explicit terms and operational flexibility. Be pragmatic

·        Get beyond the other party’s positions; understand their interests and priorities and balance with yours

·        Proactively seek solutions which balance needs

·        Use objective criteria to support decision-making whenever possible Individuals move on; minimize need for subjective interpretations

·        Keep personalities out of the negotiations

·        Remember: Preferred Partner is not necessarily Exclusive Partner

Licensor may be using this deal to rank you against other opportunities

Positive Attributes of the Negotiator

·        Good listening skills

·        Clear, consistent vision of their goals

·        Maintains a long-term vision for the partnership

·        Blunt and candid about their wants and needs

·        Honest and upfront regarding value and limitations of their offering

·        Good market awareness

·        Trustworthy and professional

·        Values integrity: keeps (most) of their promises

·        Fair and consistent

·        Discrete and considerate

·        Good sense of humor

·        Clear ability to see the other party’s point of view

It‘s all about Communication

Preparation

·        Negotiate a bilateral CDA

Do this quickly and efficiently

·        Have your confidential information package ready Products: detail of pre-clinical studies (ADME, tox, in vivo) as pdf files

Products and technology: include protocols

Customize materials for the party in question, aiming to anticipate their questions.

First Confidential Interaction

·        Create agenda jointly with the other party

·        Deliver messages effectively; stipulate timelines, constraints, expectations.

·        Probe how the other party views the opportunity, their needs and their priorities. Refer to your information chart… ask the questions! Gather as much information as you can now.

·        Establish open dialog enabling flexible problem solving for mutual gain.

·        Identify areas of agreement and disagreement to the satisfaction of both parties.

·        Identify action points; follow up promptly and definitively.

Due Diligence

·        Due diligence underpins the entire negotiation process Shows willingness of both parties to prepare and be professional

Cooperation in fielding relevant specialists is essential

Key issues identified, addressed and resolved early

·        Performed through electronic data rooms and site visits

Compound (materials)

Scientific / technical

Intellectual property

·        Due diligence = effective communication in action.

Be open and swift to respond.

Do not become defensive.

Learn from the experience.

Due Diligence – Electronic Data Rooms

·        Convenient for many types of diligence

Scientific – pre-clinical reports, animal toxicity studies, manufacturing information (SOPs, QA), clinical study reports

Intellectual property

Financial documents

·        Organization of information is critical

·        Control of access is key

Access can be staged, printing can be restricted

·        Some things still stay out of data rooms

·        Complemented by on-site visits

Due Diligence & Site Visits: Managing your Team

·        YOU are in charge

·        Select and convene your team well in advance Agree each person’s assignment

Agree any “off-limit” topics

Agree to answer only questions asked by the other party

Ensure all disclosures can be substantiated

Assure your team that “I don’t know” is an acceptable response

·        Ensure that everyone looks and behaves professionally

·        Regroup with your team afterwards to discover what has been learned

Due Diligence & Site Visits: Managing the Other Party

·        Give your visitors privacy

·        Establish and communicate your policy on copies of documents being removed from the building

·        Clean white-boards, clear meeting room of irelevant materials

·        Make sure labs are clean and offices are organized

·        Provide refreshments; arrange hotels and transportation

·        Check on progress, but don‘t hover

·        On completion, invite them to dinner with your team

Due Diligence: Science and Materials

·        Obtain questions in advance

·        Organize all reports and protocols – provide in meeting room if possible

·        Have all manufacturing information (including information or approvals from manufacturer / regulators) to hand

·        Ensure that key specialists are available where required and are fully briefed

Due Diligence: Intellectual Property

·        Prepare document room (electronic or physical) with all relevant files

·        Compile applications / patents and their status and prosecution history in spread sheet format

·        Have invention disclosure system ready

·        Assist other party in understanding specific requirements for inventor law

·        Exclude FTO opinion and other recommendations of counsel

Beyond Due Diligence: Final Term Sheet

·        Pressure-test your organization’s interests and priorities as negotiations proceed

Negotiations may have created new opportunities

Conflicting priorities may drive compromise… yet compromise may not always be the best solution

·        Define the scientific/technical scope in detail

Continue to build and manage contact between yours and their specialists

Finalize workplans

Agree go/no go decision points, especially early in the collaboration

Stay on top of IP created through these interactions

·        Due diligence may not be complete before the term sheet is finalized

Communication

Coordinated message + relationship building = agreement with minimal conflict

From Agreed Terms to Binding Contract - A Nuts and Bolts Approach

·        Establish what your agreed term sheet represents

Overall opportunity

Responsibilities

Value creation opportunities

Strategic priority for your organization

·        Refer back to your term sheet negotiations and any key issues identified with the other party

Don’t forget the agreed timetable to reach closure

·        Identify who will be involved in the legal drafting process on your side Establish contact with equivalents in other party

·        Brief your transaction team on all of the above

Building Strategic Agreements for the Long Term

·        Most deals fail to realize their full potential due to early termination

·        Impact of premature termination is far greater than failure to deliver downstream milestone and royalty payments

Opportunity cost

Disillusionment among collaborating scientists

Failure to meet board/senior management/investor expectations

Exacerbation of internal communication challenges

Damage to external reputation

·        Aim to immunize your deal against common partnership pitfalls

·        Mitigate the risk of exposure to factors beyond your control

Define the Deal Components

·        Work with your internal team to ensure that all phases of the deal (research, development, commercialization) have been thoroughly thought through

·        Construct decision trees for each deal phase (not to be shared with the other party) to give you maximum negotiation flexibility through each phase

·        Identify deal breaker issues within each phase with key internal stakeholders and address them objectively and fully

You will be in a more commanding negotiation position if you are aware of your own issues before they are raised as such by the other party

Deal Components - Research

Research issues include

1)   Research term, options to extend, research plan, sponsored vs. self-funded, where is the hand off

2)   Roles and responsibilities

3)   FTE commitment – fixed or not?

4)   Resource allocation and cost allocation

5)   Governance

6)   Intellectual property – who owns or controls?

Deal Components - Development

Development issues include

1)   Definition of product profile, development plans, resource commitment, manufacturing responsibilities for clinical supply, regulatory affairs, roles and responsibilities, cost sharing or reimbursement procedures

2)   Selection criteria for development candidate (and back-up?)

3)   Opt out provisions, rights to initial development compound vs. next generation / back-up compounds

Deal Components - Commercialization

Commercial issues include

1)   Commercialization plan

2)   Manufacturing responsibilities for commercial supply

3)   Resources

4)   Roles and responsibilities

5)   Cost sharing and reimbursement

6)   Trade-offs for retained rights

7)   Royalty vs. profit sharing

Commencement of Legal Drafting

·        As licensor, you and your transaction team should aim to produce the first draft

·        By going first, you establish an anchor point for the evolving discussions and deliberations – representing a good psychological advantage

·        Ensure that your legal counsel is fully aware of tangible and intangible factors pertinent to the

deal Maintain close contact with counsel at all times

Any specific issues that need to be carefully drafted – license grants, IP control, etc.

Be aware of any scheduling conflicts arising and communicate these to the other party in a timely fashion

·        Do not lose touch with your key stakeholders internally No need to brief executive management every step of the way – but keep your specialists on your side throughout

Behavior Management: Principles

·        Listen

·        Question

·        Summarize

·        Build on common ground

·        Build on the other party‘s ideas

·        Summarize

·        Emphasize agreement

·        Describe your feelings

·        Summarize

Behavior during Legal Drafting Negotiations

·        Explain and back up your position

Identify points of agreement with the other party – don’t place too much emphasis on areas of disagreement at this stage

·        Consider the response you will make to their best and worst reaction “You’ll have to do better than that”. Your response “Exactly how much better than that do I have to do?”

·        Avoid contradiction

it creates confrontation and eventually leads to stalemate

·        When the other party sets out their position forcefully, do not accept or reject it immediately

Probe for the interests underlying their position and explore how to address those interests

·        “If we can do that for you, what can you do for us?”

·        Ignore threats and ultimatums

These may appear to symbolize strength, but they are more often symptoms of weakness.

In these situations, use delays or silences to counter their position

·        Use “I feel”, “I felt”, “I found” to turn hostility around

·        Be aware of body language at all times

Ensure your own team is attentive and interested

Make note of sudden responses from the other party (smiles, frowns, snorts)

·        Maintain an atmosphere of co-operation and willingness to be reasonable

Making Concessions

·        Start high, concede slowly, and taper them

·        Resist slipping into dividing the pie (distributive bargaining); strive for “integrative bargaining” to trade off between issues and make the pie bigger

·        Be aware of your big and little issues. Make big moves on little issues, and little moves on big issues

o   Continue to visualize your issues as a map Deal with the entire package: no issue is closed until all associated issues have been decided

o   Seek compromise – “If you agree our requested FTE rate, we could consider rescheduling the first milestone”

·        Focus on interests, not positions Positions you will hear, underlying interests you’ll have dig hard to discover

Keep your BATNA in Sight!

Remember: “We most prefer to say yes to the requests of someone we know and like”

Use of Tactics in Negotiations

·        Negotiations naturally and inevitably involve tactics

·        Make sure you can distinguish a tactic from a “Dirty Trick”

A dirty trick is a tactic deliberately designed to mislead and/or break down the other party, leaving it with no options and/or preserving broader self-interests

·        Everyone uses dirty tricks to some extent (sometimes even subconsciously!)

·        You may call the intention of a dirty trick into question but focus instead on the behavior

·        If used on you (e.g. included in the package), declare your disappointment using “I feel”, “I felt”, “I found” statements

Examples of Tactics

Many tactics can influence negotiation outcome

·        Anchoring – influence opinion by dropping a number as a reference point

·        Nudging – direct choices subconsciously, without forbidding any options

·        Authority – cite key opinion leaders, experts, boards of directors, etc. Can be a form of nudge

·        Risk aversion to loss

Anchoring

·        Anchoring on the offense.

Set high goals prior to negotiation.

Open with the best deal for you (highest or lowest number) to give a framework of reference.

·        Anchoring on the defense.

Use a de-biasing strategy – think about the opposite perspective when a number is given.

Ignore the details of the case at hand; seek market comparables.

·        Experience and information is the key to anchoring… how good is yours? How good is theirs?

Nudging

·        A nudge in the real world is easy to find… fruit at eye level and junk food hidden away, making something an active choice to achieve the non-ideal result (subscribing to a newsletter as the default).

·        Setting up the milestones in a deal that you want so the other side only thinks to change the number - not the event that causes it

·        Keep in mind that small and apparently insignificant details can have major impacts on people’s behavior.

Authority

An influence tactic that is used all the time

·        Citing or engaging an expert and referencing their qualifications Though an expert can define what is fair and what isn’t

·        Having reams of paper with data from key opinion leaders

·        Using the board of directors or the CEO as a smokescreen for refusing to compromise or delivering an ultimatum.

·        Can lead the other side to neglect competitor information.

Risk of Loss

·        Studies have shown that people are more risk-averse when they are contemplating gains.

They will go for the higher chance of a gain.

Or if they are told they have a high chance of losing a larger amount of money, they choose the 100% chance of losing the smaller amount of money rather than a small chance of losing nothing.

They prefer surety for loss.

·        Result: give good news in chunks and bad news all at once.

·        Frame choices in terms of losses rather than gains.

Dealing with Derailed Negotiations

·        Is the delay a one-off hitch in communication? Chronic slowness? Indication of a wider issue in the partner organization? Maneuvering for an advantage?

·        An emerging pattern requires decisive action and an escalating response If there is clear evidence of a cultural disconnect or pattern of “dirty tricks” emanating from the other side, broach the subject with the lead negotiator(s), preferably alone and definitely in private

·        Determine whether the party is serious about doing a deal Does the pattern of behavior in negotiations portend problems in a future partnership?

·        Resume negotiations with mutually agreed provisos or “walk”, depending on the severity of the impasse, your response to it and your options

 “Walking Away” Is More Than a Tactic

·        The primary objective of a negotiation is not to do a deal – it’s to advance one’s business through doing a deal

·        Define internally the point at which a deal structure and/or partnership becomes a net, long-term loss

·        Be clear throughout the negotiation about which terms are absolute “must haves” or “deal-breakers”

·        If the negotiation fails, examine the extent to which the failure resulted from that specific partner Or was there a weakness in the technology which needed to be overcome? Or were your objectives unrealistic at the outset?

·        Sometimes a deal not done is the appropriate outcome

Gaining Commitment

·        When agreement has finally been reached, do not gloat over your victories nor brood over your defeats

·        Continue to work cooperatively with the other party to build trust and manage the relationship

·        Remain responsive to the timely identification of problems and negotiation of solutions

·        Keep sight of the goal: to secure commitment. Signing the agreement is just a symbol of that commitment

Closing: When? How?

When

·                  All remaining gaps have narrowed

·                  Their concessions or yours have dried up

·                  You are at your target or limit

·                  Implementation questions start taking over

·                  Body language... Everyone is interested

How

·        Summarize and agree (eye contact, firm language)

·        One last concession (if we agree to this then we have a deal).

·        Make final offer – confer with your team, package it, firm delivery, pack up your papers, close your pen, and shut up after you say so

1.   If they don’t accept it and you still want to continue, break out with your team to discuss further options. Or sleep on it!

2.   If they give it, did they leave a way out? Ignore the finality, break out with your team to discuss further options.

Visualizing Cultural Understanding

Awareness of Cultural Differences

Applies equally to sectors, companies, countries, and within teams

Language, values, expectations, philosophies

Cultural understanding and fit is relevant to the nature of the deal being negotiated

e.g. Arms length license vs. merger

Impact of Culture on Negotiation

Example of Communication Patterns

Non-verbal Communication

·        Be conscious of your own body language during negotiations

·        Basic observations

Leaning away or arms crossed – unconvinced, not interested

Hands steepled – confidence

Hands together with thumbs up – positive thoughts

Crossed legs with jiggling feet – impatience, discomfort

Fiddling with objects – doubt, insecurity

·        Remember that your emotions show on your face

·        Be aware that some body language may simply reflect a lack of understanding

Top Nine for Negotiating Across Cultures

1. Prepare, prepare, prepare

Don‘t be derailed by problems arising from things you should have known

2. Avoid jargon, idioms and slang

3. A picture is worth a thousand words Support your case with instructive visuals

4. Patience, patience, patience Especially where cultures do not see time as money

5. Retain cultural neutrality

Do not judge

6. Think long-term Written agreement may be seen as just the start of the relationship

7. Know thyself Recognise where your own preferences may lead to cultural stereotypes / prejudice

8. Thou shalt not….. Comment on the other party’s approach to and ethics of doing business, way of life, laws, religion, race, etc.

9. Be prepared to say No