Showing posts with label Certification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Certification. Show all posts

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Competence vs Certification

Competence vs. Certification for a Person 

๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—œ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜€

In today’s world, everyone is chasing visibility, titles, and recognition.
But here’s the truth: competing with others is outdated. The real differentiator now is collaboration, creativity and contribution.

A wide range of certification programs are now available for different sectors from various industries. Given that one industry is unique from another, there are several procedures followed by industry-specific needs, creating an unstandardized process.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Competence refers to a person’s ability to apply knowledge, skills, and behaviors to perform a task successfully in a real-world context. It’s more than just what someone knows - it's about how well they can use that knowledge effectively. They might be no academic certificate.

A competence often includes three dimensions:

Knowledge (theoretical understanding)

Skills (practical abilities)

Attitudes and behaviors (how a person acts in a given real-world context)

Example: A competent project manager doesn’t just know about project planning—they can lead a team, communicate clearly with stakeholders, manage risk, and adapt to challenges.

๐Ÿค— KPI

·        Focus: The actual real life or site specific application of knowledge and skills to perform tasks effectively. 

·        Nature: A current state of capability, assessed through performance. 

·        Examples: The ability to solve problems, make decisions, full fill the customer focus or adapt to new situations. 

·        Assessment: Involves practical examinations and observation to measure the ability to achieve desired results. Customer satisfaction system handover.

๐Ÿ‘‰ A qualification or certification is a formal recognition of learning or achievement which is granted by an educational institution, professional body, or certifying authority after a person completes a course, passes an exam, assessment or meets specific criteria.

A qualification or certification often includes two dimensions:

Knowledge (theoretical understanding)

Skills (theoretical & sometimes practical lab abilities)

Example: A degree in marketing, a Microsoft certification, or a teaching license are all qualifications. They prove that a person has completed a particular program or standard of learning.

๐Ÿค— KPI:

·        Focus: Formal education, training, and documented experience.

·        Nature: A historical fact or status.

·        Examples: A driving license, a college degree, or certificates from training courses.

·        Assessment: Based on credentials and proof of training.

In short:

๐Ÿ”น Qualifications tell us what someone has learned.

๐Ÿ”น Competences show us what someone can actually do.

Lately, I’ve been noticing how students (and even professionals) run after certificates as if that’s the ultimate key to success.

A new course? “Certificate mil raha hai bhai, karna hi padega!”

Many skip the actual learning part, just to grab the certificate at the end. In current date AI is there to pass exam.

LinkedIn is full of such posts — some celebrating skills, but many just stacking certificates like badges.

According to ISO 19011, Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems, competence is defined as “the ability to apply knowledge and skills to achieve intended results.” In practical terms, competence-based certification requires candidates to demonstrate their abilities through validated means - such as examinations, practical assessments, or performance evaluations - covering not only knowledge, but also skills and behaviors aligned with the certification’s scope.

On the other hand, qualification-based certification typically relies on reviewing the applicant’s education, course attendance, or prior training. It assumes that completion of training equals capability, with minimal or no independent verification of actual performance or ability.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Consider the following simple yet illustrative exchange:

- "Do you know how to drive a car?"

- "I’ve taken lessons, and I have a license, but I’m still not confident behind the wheel."

- "Then you have the qualifications, but not the competence."

๐Ÿ‘‰ This brief dialogue captures a critical truth: Qualifications alone do not guarantee competence. History is filled with examples of individuals - college dropouts among them - who rose to executive leadership roles not because of their academic records, but because of their demonstrated competence.

๐Ÿ‘‰ No certificate or degree will fulfill your dreams unless you have the real skills to back it up.

Certificates may open a door, but only skills will help you stay inside the room.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Similarities Between Competence and Certification or Qualification

Despite the differences, these two concepts are interconnected:

·        Qualifications often serve as a foundation for building competences. For example, a person with a qualification in data analysis likely has some competences in handling data, interpreting results, or using analytical tools.

·        Both are used in recruitment, promotion, and development decisions.

·        In some fields (e.g., healthcare or engineering), certain qualifications are required to demonstrate competence in critical tasks.

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) developed ISO/IEC 17024:2012, Conformity assessment – General Requirements for Bodies Operating Certification of Persons which contains principles and requirements for a body certifying persons against specific requirements and includes the development and maintenance of a certification scheme for persons.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Personnel Certification is a certificate issued by an independent professional body that the proven qualifications and skills match predefined training goals. It tests and certifies qualifications and competences with a highly specialized team of examination designers and experts in this field. The entire process is developed together with the organization, with maximum reliability on professional experience and proximity to the clients. The service is highly applicable to the following:

·        Companies who place great importance on the excellent qualification of their staff in order to deliver excellent service, advice, and support can be informed which employees have met the required competency targets.

·        Associations who want to offer an additional high quality qualification that particularly recommends the member companies can be informed whether the participating staff of the member companies has reached the target competence.

·        Training providers with qualified experts who want to specialize further in order to be the best employee or freelance contractor in their field can have confidence in their own training and have their examination carried out by an independent third party.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Key Differences in Personnel Certification

·        What They Prove:

Qualification proves that a person has received training or possesses certain credentials, whereas competence proves that a person can do something effectively. 

·        Assessment Methods:

Qualifications are often verified by reviewing documents (e.g., diplomas, certificates), while competence requires performance-based evaluations or practical tests to assess how well someone applies their knowledge and skills. 

·        Relationship:

While having qualifications can contribute to competence, they don't guarantee it. A person might be highly qualified but lack the practical competence to perform a job successfully, or they may be highly competent without extensive formal qualifications.

๐Ÿ‘‰ OSHA’s “Competent Person” vs. “Qualified Person”: Why the Distinction Matters in Safety & the Future of Work
In safety management, words aren’t just semantics—they shape responsibility.

๐Ÿ”น A Qualified Person (29 CFR 1926.32(m)) means one who, by possession of a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or who by extensive knowledge, training, and experience, has successfully demonstrated his ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the subject matter, the work, or the project.

๐Ÿ”น A Competent Person (29 CFR 1926.32(f)) is empowered to identify hazards and take immediate corrective action. Think of them as the boots-on-the-ground authority, ensuring risks are recognized and eliminated in real time.

This dual requirement shows how safety is both practical and technical—authority on site, backed by expertise in design.

Now imagine the future: AI-driven hazard recognition systems that instantly flag risks, combined with human competent persons authorized to act. Or AI-assisted designs ensuring qualified persons make even more precise decisions.

The question is not whether AI will redefine “competence” and “qualification,” but how we, as safety leaders, will integrate these emerging tools without losing human judgment.

Because at the end of the day, safety isn’t just compliance—it’s foresight.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Why the Distinction Matters

·        Workplace Safety:

A "qualified" person might design a system, but a "competent" person is needed to recognize hazards and ensure safety in the actual work environment. 

·        Effective Training:

Competency-based programs focus on the results of training by assessing actual abilities, leading to more targeted development and better-skilled employees. 

·        Better Hiring Decisions:

Distinguishing between competence and qualification helps employers make more accurate hiring and promotion decisions by assessing a candidate's practical abilities, not just their educational background.

๐Ÿ‘‰ American National Standards Institute (ANSI) also has a definition for a competent person and another for a qualified person.

ANSI defines a competent person as “an individual designated by the employer to be responsible for the immediate supervision, implementation, and monitoring of the employer’s managed fall protection program who, through training and knowledge, is capable of identifying, evaluating, and addressing existing and potential fall hazards, and who has the employer’s authority to take prompt, corrective action with regards to such hazards.”

ANSI defines a qualified person as “a person with a recognized degree or professional certificate and with extensive knowledge, training, and experience in the fall protection and rescue field who is capable of designing, analyzing, evaluating, and specifying fall protection and rescue systems to the extent required by this standard.”

๐Ÿ‘‰ Empathy + Analytics = True Quality:

Data gives you numbers
๐Ÿ”ข
Empathy gives you context
๐Ÿงพ

The best QA leaders know how to blend both.
An agent’s low score might not mean incompetence, it could mean lack of clarity, wrong training, or unrealistic expectations.
When analytics meets empathy, real quality improvement happens
๐Ÿ†

⚜️ Competence vs. Professionalism ⚜️
๐Ÿค— Unfortunately, we will not be moving forward with your candidacy for the position of...

Yes, the job market is tough right now. But is it really that bad?

In roughly 90% of cases, you’re simply not seen or heard.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Candidate A is competent:
๐Ÿ”น Motivated.
๐Ÿ”น Knows every interview stage.
๐Ÿ”น Has N years of experience, mastered M technologies across K domains.
๐Ÿ”น Their background looks complex - or at least they try to make it look that way.
๐Ÿ”บ The problem? Matching that exact mix with a company is rare, and usually companies want even more ๐Ÿค”

๐Ÿ“จ "...Your qualifications and experiences will be reviewed to determine if there’s a mutual fit..." - that’s the standard automated reply.

And the final response usually sounds the same:
๐Ÿ“จ "Unfortunately, we will not be moving forward with your candidacy for the position of…"
Sometimes they add: “Let’s stay in touch...” - but it doesn’t really change anything.

Do you know who actually gets ahead (if the position is truly open)?

๐Ÿ‘‰ Candidate B is a professional. Here’s what they do:
๐Ÿ”น They research the company.
๐Ÿ”น They dig for insights into the tech stack, pain points, and direction of development.
๐Ÿ”น Then they reach out and say: “I can help solve your problems in domains D1 and D2 using technologies T1 and T2 (and maybe T3 and T4). I already have experience doing this, for example, at..."

๐Ÿ’ก Businesses react instantly to this approach. Sometimes there won’t even be a full interview - or it gets simplified.

With the same (or similar) competence, Candidate B shows professionalism from the company’s perspective, and that’s why they get noticed.

Of course, it’s not foolproof, but it’s far more effective than Candidate A’s approach.

๐Ÿ‘‰ A nice fairy tale? Not at all. This is reality.

๐ŸŽฌ Even a 2009 movie said it best:
“Baccha, kamyaab hone ke liye nahi… kabil hone ke liye padho.
Success ke peeche mat bhaago, excellence ke peeche bhaago."

เคธिเคฐ्เคซ เคธเคซเคฒ (Successful) เคนोเคจे เค•े เคชीเค›े เคฎเคค เคญाเค—ो, เคฌเคฒ्เค•ि เคธเค•्เคทเคฎ (Capable) เคฌเคจो, เคคाเค•ि เคธเคซเคฒเคคा เค…เคชเคจे เค†เคช เคคुเคฎ्เคนाเคฐे เคชीเค›े เค†เค; เคถिเค•्เคทा เค•ा เคฎเค•เคธเคฆ เคœ्เคžाเคจ เค”เคฐ เค•ाเคฌिเคฒिเคฏเคค เคนाเคธिเคฒ เค•เคฐเคจा เคนोเคจा เคšाเคนिเค, เคจ เค•ि เคธिเคฐ्เคซ เคกिเค—्เคฐी เคฏा เคฎाเคฐ्เค•्เคธ เคชाเคจा, เค•्เคฏोंเค•ि เค•ाเคฌिเคฒिเคฏเคค เคนी เค…เคธเคฒी เคธเคซเคฒเคคा เค•ी เค•ुंเคœी เคนै เค”เคฐ เค‰เคค्เค•ृเคท्เคŸเคคा (Excellence) เค•ा เคชीเค›ा เค•เคฐเคจे เคธे เค•ाเคฎเคฏाเคฌी (Success) เคœ़เคฐूเคฐ เคฎिเคฒเคคी เคนै.

·        เค•ाเคฎเคฏाเคฌी (Success): เค…เค•्เคธเคฐ เคฒोเค— เคธिเคฐ्เคซ เคชैเคธा, เคชเคฆ เคฏा เค…เคš्เค›ी เคจौเค•เคฐी เคชाเคจे เค•े เคฒिเค เคชเคข़เคคे เคนैं, เคœिเคธे เค•ाเคฎเคฏाเคฌी เค•เคนเคคे เคนैं, เคฒेเค•िเคจ เคฏเคน เค…เคธ्เคฅाเคฏी เคนो เคธเค•เคคी เคนै.

·        เค•ाเคฌिเคฒिเคฏเคค (Capability): เค•ाเคฌिเคฒ เคนोเคจे เค•ा เคฎเคคเคฒเคฌ เคนै เค•ि เค†เคชเค•े เคชाเคธ เคœ्เคžाเคจ, เค•ौเคถเคฒ เค”เคฐ เคธเคฎเค เคนो, เคœिเคธเคธे เค†เคช เค•िเคธी เคญी เคฎुเคถ्เค•िเคฒ เค•ा เคธाเคฎเคจा เค•เคฐ เคธเค•ें เค”เคฐ เค•ुเค› เคจเคฏा เคฌเคจा เคธเค•ें