Protocol |
BACnet |
Modbus |
LonWorks |
Full Name |
Building Automation Controls |
Serial Communication Protocol |
Local Operational Networks |
Developed By: |
ASHRAE |
Modicon Inc. |
Echelon Corporation/ Motorola |
Use |
Communication
across devices |
Connection
between devices |
Networking
devices through power lines, fiber optics, and other media |
Markets |
Industrial,
Transportation, Energy Management, Building Automation, Regulatory and health
and safety |
HVAC,
Lighting, Life Safety, Access Controls, transportation and maintenance |
Home
automation, industrial, transportation, and public utility control networks. |
Examples |
Boiler
Control, Tank Level Measurements |
Tasks
such as request temperature reading, send status alarm, or fan schedule |
Security,
lighting systems, HVAC, machine control, manufacturing, metering |
Proprietary |
No |
No |
Yes |
Transmission Modes |
Ethernet,
IP, MS/TP, Zigbee |
ASCII,
RTU, TCP/IP |
MS/TP,
network, SNVT |
Standards |
ANSI/ASHRAE
Standard 185 ;ISO-16484-5; ISO-16484-6 |
IEC
61158 |
ANSI/EIA
709.1; ISO/IEC 14908-1, 14908-2, 14908-3, 14908-4 |
Costs |
Low;
No charge for usage or licensing fees |
Low;
No charge for usage or licensing fees |
High
(proprietary); Limited users (exclusive to actual members; mostly manufacturers) |
Network Interfaces |
Existing
LANs and LANs infrastructure |
Traditional
serial and Ethernet protocols |
U10/U20
USB Network Interface; i.LON SmartServer; i.LON 600 |
Testing |
BACnet Testing Labs |
Modbus
TCP Conformance Testing Program |
Products
must conform to LonWorks protocol |
Advantages |
-
Scalability between cost, performance and system size |
-
Easy connection to Modicon |
-
Web based tool; saves time and cost |
-
Endorsement and adoption by nearly every major vendor in North America and
many other countries |
-
Suitable for small/medium volumes of data (≤255 bytes) |
-
Numerous developers of LonWorks products in the market |
|
-
Robust internetworking including multiple LAN types and dial-up |
-
Data transfer designed for industrial applications |
-
Less Architecture at device level |
|
-
Unrestricted growth and the ability to add new innovations and new features
anytime |
-
Openly published and royalty-free |
|
|
|
-
Easy to deploy and maintain |
|
|
|
-
Moves raw bits or words without placing restrictions on vendors |
|
|
Disadvantages |
-
Limited the number of field devices that can connect to a master station
except Ethernet TCP/IP |
-
Limited the number of data types; Large binary objects are not supported. |
-
Outdated |
- MT/TP-Wire
Length |
-
No standard method for a node to find the description of a data object, i.e.
finding a register value represents a temperature between 30◦ and
175◦. |
-
Controlled devices & variables are connected to a separate control
device. (Not recommended due to network interruptions producing system
failures) |
|
-
Ethernet-Infrastructure |
-
No security against unauthorized commands or interception of data |
-
Extensions are allowed only through the LonMark Consortium. |
|
-
New standard has security standard but not implemented in all devices |
-
Transmissions must be contiguous which limits the types of remote
communications devices to those that can buffer data to avoid gaps in the
transmission. |
-
Hardware specific, and requires the Neuron chip for network movement of the
protocol. |
|
|
-
Great amount of configuration and programming required |
-
Close to “plug & play” ability, yet still far from achieving
interconnectivity using Microsoft Windows. |
|
|
-
Protocol is not common in the SIMATIC family |
|
This blog is meant as a resource for Security Professionals,Property Managers, Builders, Designing Consultants, Architects, Project Managers, Law makers, Building approving authorities, Facility Managers, Security & Safety Officers & System Integrators. From Now we add Automation write-ups. For Safety please visit http://bhadrafiresafety.blogspot.in/ If you found this is useful then donate some amount, pls read my complete profile in RHS.
Showing posts with label Proprietary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proprietary. Show all posts
Friday, October 20, 2017
Building Automation Protocol selecting
Building Automation Protocol selecting
Each of the competing
protocols claims to be the best. So how do facility executives select the one
that is best suited for the facility?
Data is communicated
between devices through a Communication Protocol. It is the language that a
particular device is able to interpret and forward to other devices on the
network. Some common protocols are BACnet, Lon, and Modbus.
Protocols must be
selected based on the needs of the facility and its ability to support a
particular protocol. Each has been used many times to implement an
interoperable system. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Involve your
information technology department. They generally are the controlling agency
for the facility’s network infrastructure.
When selecting a control
system choose one where the front end is compatible with a number of protocols.
This will give greater flexibility as building equipment and devices change
over time.
Why you want a BMS with
open protocols
A BMS with proprietary
protocols locks the system owner into using a single BMS vendor. For example,
you can’t remotely change the set points of a proprietary BMS unless you use
the vendor’s software.
In contrast, with open
and standard BMS protocols you can shop for alternative providers of digital
devices and enterprise software.
Building Automation
Controls Network (BACnet): BACnet is a network protocol specifically used for multiple
devices to communicate across building automation systems by system users and
building system manufacturers
Modbus: Modbus is a network protocol best used for
industrial automation systems specifically for connecting electronic equipment.
Although Modbus is best for industrial applications, its simplicity allows it to
be a useful tool for building automation as well.
LonWorks: LonWorks is a communication network protocol useful for building
automation applications designed on a low bandwidth, for networking devices
through power lines, fiber optics, and other media.
To determine whether a
BMS protocol is open, ask the vendor two simple questions:
1.
Can your competitors
exchange data with your BMS?
2.
Is the system’s protocol
published in such a way that it’s easily accessible to everyone (including
competitors)?
Even the ASHRAE BACNet
committee has convened a working group to define use of XML with BACnet systems.
The group is also working to define web services that will enable data exchange
between building automation and control systems and various enterprise
management systems.
Use these criteria when
you’re choosing devices and BMS:
1.
For devices such as RTUs
and refrigeration controllers, look for ones that use open protocols such as
BACnet or Modbus.
2.
Make sure these devices
give you both “read” and “write” capabilities so you can change set points.
3.
For easy enterprise
access, choose a BMS with web services and XML capabilities.
4.
Make sure the web
services of the BMS allow both read and write capabilities.
5.
Be sure the BMS supplier
provides the XML dictionary and definitions of web services to anyone,
including competitors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)