Arguments Against Video Surveillance
As the use of CCTV cameras increases across the globe, so does the debate
over their numbers and motives. In a previous post, Arguments for Video
Surveillance, we looked at four arguments for video surveillance. These arguments
included peace of mind, loss prevention, crime deterrent, and crime solving.
But what about the other side of the fence? The ACLU has an entire Web
site, You Are Being Watched, devoted to the “high costs of camera surveillance
systems, both in terms of money and civil liberties,” and there are a large
number of individuals and other groups out there that oppose “big brother”
watching our every move.
So, what are some of the arguments against the use of CCTV surveillance
systems?
- Invasion
of Privacy – This is the most common argument against
surveillance systems. While video surveillance is more commonly accepted
in public areas, this sentiment comes into play with the use of covert and
hidden cameras in almost every case.
- Mistrust – The use of security cameras in your home or business can make its
occupants feel mistrusted. If your family members or employees are under
constant surveillance, there is likely to be hostility and animosity in
the air.
- Not
Proven Effective – Studies done in California and London have found
that security cameras had little to no effect on reducing the crime rate.
With an increase in the sheer number of cameras in many large cities, many
replacing human security guards, this is a strong argument that will be
the main target of many opposing groups.
- Misuse
and Abuse – The footage captured by CCTV cameras becomes
susceptible to abuse and misuse by those who have access to it. For
instance, the footage can be used to discriminate against people and for
voyeurism. In the age of the internet, this is another huge deal, as can
be seen by all of the “hilarious” YouTube videos out there. I doubt the
subjects would find most of them as funny.
All of these reasons are valid arguments against CCTV surveillance. There
are many cities and countries that have massive surveillance systems, and we
will likely see a large increase in public monitoring in the near future, so
the more the public knows about the industry and their rights, etc, the more
everyone can prepare for when it happens in your little corner of the globe.
Do you have any additional arguments against the use of security camera
systems? What are your thoughts? Will you fight them, or open your “public”
life up willingly to being observed? Let us know – we’d love to hear from you.
