Showing posts with label ASHRAE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ASHRAE. Show all posts

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Procure BACnet System

Procure BACnet System

BACnet was designed to allow communication of building automation and controlsystems for applications such as heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning control (HVAC), lighting control, access control, and fire detection systems and their associated equipment.
The UDP port number 47808 (in hexadecimal, X'BAC0') identifies BACnet messages and is the UDP port used by PAD devices. BACnet/IP devices use this UDP port by default but may be configured to use a different number if necessary. An open protocol should be powerful and robust, capable of meeting all future communication needs, as well as the present needs throughout all system levels. Any communication protocol which doesn't meet these criteria should be eliminated from further consideration.

BACnet's open structure and object-oriented commands enables developers to provide enhancements or features, while still maintaining full interoperability for all core operations. If use of a new control feature becomes widespread and there is a need for it to be standardized among vendors. ASHRAE provides a procedure for it to be adopted as a standard BACnet object or service.
BACnet is a widely accepted, non-proprietary open protocol standard. Companies began announcing their support for BACnet even before the final draft of the standard was released. The fact that ASHRAE developed BACnet plays a significant role in this acceptance. ANSI perceived BACnet to be a significant development and adopted it as a protocol standard within months of acceptance by ASHRAE.
Components vs Systems
For many years the BACnet community has worked hard to ensure that BACnet is a global standard and that it’s implemented consistently across multiple supplier product lines.  BACnet International devotes substantial resources to the BACnet Testing Lab (BTL) and to annual device “plugfests” to support that objective.  We regularly point out that BACnet is a global consensus standard and we trumpet the value of standards.  We talk about component interoperability and in some cases even interchangeability.  All of this is good.  Users need to understand the power of standards and how specifying systems that incorporate BACnet can add value to their building automation investments.  However, by promoting BACnet as standard and then using the shortcut term “BACnet System” we invite the unschooled to mistakenly extend the concept of “standard” from the communications protocol to the system.  That seems to lead some of them to the conclusion that all “BACnet Systems” are essentially equivalent and can be procured like commodity products … even to the point of the “reverse auction” procurement process for an energy management system I recently encountered. 

Reverse Auction Procurement
Reverse auctions have been around for more than a decade.  They evolved as a “simple” way for buyers to drive down the cost of components.  The essence of reverse auctions is that suppliers bid back and forth for a well-defined piece of business on the basis of price.  Full-featured web platforms have evolved to support this purchasing model but, even so, it has its limitations.  One of the biggest limitations is that for it to be effective, the product and its associated transaction attributes (e.g. lead time, delivery date, etc.) need to be unambiguously defined in terms that can be readily measured.  And therein is the rub.  Energy management and building automation systems are complex so fully defining all of the important attributes is a huge challenge.  Leaving any important attribute undefined results in suppliers compromising on those unspecified attributes to achieve the lowest cost and win the business.  On the surface the result might look like a good deal for the buyer.  But those compromises might well come back to haunt the buyer in the long run.


Lessons Learned
It was an attempt to give people new to the BACnet community some insights based on the experience of people who have already designed and operated systems built around BACnet.  One of those “lessons learned” was that a “BACnet System” is still a system. The BACnet standard can make system integration faster, simpler and more effective but it is not a substitute for system expertise, creativity or design rigor.  Nor does BACnet provide any assurance of product quality or system effectiveness.  These come only through knowledge and experience.  So, I encouraged owner/operators to develop a partnership approach to working with suppliers who have that knowledge and experience. I saw first-hand what happens when complex systems procurement is driven from a “first cost” perspective without sufficient focus on supplier partnerships.

Benefits of BACnet Protocol

  • Single operator workstation for all systems
  • competitive system expansion.
  • Eliminates fear of being an owner to be locked in with a single vendor.
  • Possibility of integrating all BAC Functions.
  • Interoperability
·         Data sharing
·         Alarm and event management
·         Trending
·         Scheduling

·         Remote device and network management

Summary
BACnet is a standard. All the necessary elements are in place: strong customer demand, a robust open standard and manufacturer's support of the standard. BACnet seems to provide a complete solution to interoperability issues for building procurement  team.  Understanding the difference is important in establishing a procurement process that builds positive supplier relationships and generates maximum value in acquiring an energy management or building automation system. SSA Integrate can guide how to utilize this.


Friday, October 20, 2017

Building Automation Protocol selecting

Building Automation Protocol selecting

Each of the competing protocols claims to be the best. So how do facility executives select the one that is best suited for the facility?

Data is communicated between devices through a Communication Protocol. It is the language that a particular device is able to interpret and forward to other devices on the network. Some common protocols are BACnet, Lon, and Modbus.

Protocols must be selected based on the needs of the facility and its ability to support a particular protocol. Each has been used many times to implement an interoperable system. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Involve your information technology department. They generally are the controlling agency for the facility’s network infrastructure.


When selecting a control system choose one where the front end is compatible with a number of protocols. This will give greater flexibility as building equipment and devices change over time.

Why you want a BMS with open protocols
A BMS with proprietary protocols locks the system owner into using a single BMS vendor. For example, you can’t remotely change the set points of a proprietary BMS unless you use the vendor’s software.
In contrast, with open and standard BMS protocols you can shop for alternative providers of digital devices and enterprise software.

Building Automation Controls Network (BACnet): BACnet is a network protocol specifically used for multiple devices to communicate across building automation systems by system users and building system manufacturers

Modbus: Modbus is a network protocol best used for industrial automation systems specifically for connecting electronic equipment. Although Modbus is best for industrial applications, its simplicity allows it to be a useful tool for building automation as well.


LonWorks: LonWorks is a communication network protocol useful for building automation applications designed on a low bandwidth, for networking devices through power lines, fiber optics, and other media.

Protocol
BACnet
Modbus
LonWorks
Full Name
Building Automation Controls
Serial Communication Protocol
Local Operational Networks
Developed By:
ASHRAE
Modicon Inc.
Echelon Corporation/ Motorola
Use
Communication across devices
Connection between devices
Networking devices through power lines, fiber optics, and other media
Markets
Industrial, Transportation, Energy Management, Building Automation, Regulatory and health and safety
HVAC, Lighting, Life Safety, Access Controls, transportation and maintenance
Home automation, industrial, transportation, and public utility control networks.
Examples
Boiler Control, Tank Level Measurements
Tasks such as request temperature reading, send status alarm, or fan schedule
Security, lighting systems, HVAC, machine control, manufacturing, metering
Proprietary
No
No
Yes
Transmission Modes
Ethernet, IP, MS/TP, Zigbee
ASCII, RTU, TCP/IP
MS/TP, network, SNVT
Standards
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 185 ;ISO-16484-5; ISO-16484-6
IEC 61158 
ANSI/EIA 709.1; ISO/IEC 14908-1, 14908-2, 14908-3, 14908-4
Costs
Low; No charge for usage or licensing fees
Low; No charge for usage or licensing fees
High (proprietary); Limited users (exclusive to actual members;  mostly manufacturers)
Network Interfaces
Existing LANs and LANs infrastructure
Traditional serial and Ethernet protocols
U10/U20 USB Network Interface; i.LON SmartServer; i.LON 600
Testing
BACnet Testing Labs
Modbus TCP Conformance Testing Program
Products must  conform to LonWorks protocol
Advantages
- Scalability between cost, performance and system size
- Easy connection to Modicon
- Web based tool; saves time and cost
- Endorsement and adoption by nearly every major vendor in North America and many other countries
- Suitable for small/medium volumes of data (≤255 bytes)
- Numerous developers of LonWorks products in the market
- Robust internetworking including multiple LAN types and dial-up
- Data transfer designed for industrial applications
- Less Architecture at device level
- Unrestricted growth and the ability to add new innovations and new features anytime
- Openly published and royalty-free


- Easy to deploy and maintain


- Moves raw bits or words without placing restrictions on vendors

Disadvantages
- Limited the number of field devices that can connect to a master station except Ethernet TCP/IP
- Limited the number of data types; Large binary objects are not supported.
- Outdated
- MT/TP-Wire Length
- No standard method for a node to find the description of a data object, i.e. finding a register value represents a temperature between 30 and 175.
- Controlled devices & variables are connected to a separate control device. (Not recommended due to network interruptions producing system failures)
- Ethernet-Infrastructure
- No security against unauthorized commands or interception of data
- Extensions are allowed only through the LonMark Consortium.
- New standard has security standard but not implemented in all devices
- Transmissions must be contiguous which limits the types of remote communications devices to those that can buffer data to avoid gaps in the transmission.
- Hardware specific, and requires the Neuron chip for network movement of the protocol.

- Great amount of configuration and programming required
- Close to “plug & play” ability, yet still far from achieving interconnectivity using Microsoft Windows.

- Protocol is not common in the SIMATIC family


To determine whether a BMS protocol is open, ask the vendor two simple questions:
1.     Can your competitors exchange data with your BMS?
2.     Is the system’s protocol published in such a way that it’s easily accessible to everyone (including competitors)?



Even the ASHRAE BACNet committee has convened a working group to define use of XML with BACnet systems. The group is also working to define web services that will enable data exchange between building automation and control systems and various enterprise management systems.

Use these criteria when you’re choosing devices and BMS:
1.     For devices such as RTUs and refrigeration controllers, look for ones that use open protocols such as BACnet or Modbus.
2.     Make sure these devices give you both “read” and “write” capabilities so you can change set points.
3.     For easy enterprise access, choose a BMS with web services and XML capabilities.
4.     Make sure the web services of the BMS allow both read and write capabilities.
5.     Be sure the BMS supplier provides the XML dictionary and definitions of web services to anyone, including competitors.