Showing posts with label utc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label utc. Show all posts

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Know about BMS technical protocols

BMS - What you should know about technical protocols

If you or a client is choosing a building management system (or BMS), it’s important to understand how it communicates information with digital devices such as controllers, meters, and input/output boards, and computers.

The details are important because some BMS use languages—or technical protocols—that lock you into using their vendor’s proprietary technology. Use of such protocols may force you and your client to pay higher prices for software and hardware available from only one vendor or its licensees.

This article describes common categories of BMS protocols. It recommends that you avoid proprietary protocols and favor more open ones.

A BMS communicates through protocols
To exchange data, digital devices must use a common data structure and a common channel or medium of communication.

The figure below shows a master BMS that communicates with devices that use microprocessors. They include a roof-top unit (or RTU), refrigeration controllers, energy meters, and other input/output boards within a building. The building controller also uses the Internet to share temperature, operating parameters, or energy data with remote users through enterprise servers or personal computers.
A BMS protocol defines the format and meaning of each data element, in much the same way a dictionary defines the spelling and meaning of words.

The data exchange often occurs through a physical wire such as a twisted-pair RS485 or an Ethernet CAT5 cable). It may also occur wirelessly over wi-fi network, through an internet protocol (or IP).
The phrase “BACNet over IP” means the BACNet protocol communicates through an IP network.
Some protocols are more open than others
Protocols fit in one of four categories, depending on their relative “openness:”
1.       Open. The protocol is readily available to everyone.
2.       Standard. All parties agree to a common data structure. The protocol may be an industry standard, such as BACnet and Modbus.
3.       Inter-operable. The protocol is vendor agnostic. A controller from one vendor can replace one from a different vendor.
4.       Proprietary. The data structure is restricted to the creator of the device.

Why you want BMS with open protocols
A BMS with proprietary protocols locks the system owner into using a single BMS vendor. For example, you can’t remotely change the set points of a proprietary BMS unless you use the vendor’s software.
In contrast, with open and standard BMS protocols you can shop for alternative providers of digital devices and enterprise software.

This is why use of proprietary protocols is inconsistent with best practice. The lesson is clear:
In choosing a BMS, be sure its protocols are not proprietary.

How to know whether a BMS protocol is open
To determine whether a BMS protocol is open, ask the vendor two simple questions:
1.       Can your competitors exchange data with your BMS?
2.   Is the system’s protocol published in such a way that it’s easily accessible to everyone (including competitors)?

Best open protocols: BACNet, Modbus, and XML
For a master controller that exchanges data with devices and meters within a building, prefer the BACNet, Modbus or any other standard protocol. Otherwise, make sure it’s at least open enough so anyone with proper security access can read and write information.

For remote enterprise access (protocol B in the figure), organizations often use BACnet over IP.
The current trend is toward use of additional Internet technologies. Companies like Honeywell Tridium (Niagara framework) and many others have exchanged data through standard internet eXtensible Markup Language (or XML) with web services.

Even the ASHRAE BACNet committee has convened a working group to define use of XML with BACnet systems. The group is also working to define web services that will enable data exchange between building automation and control systems and various enterprise management systems.

Put in short, use these criteria when you’re choosing devices and BMS:
·         For devices such as RTUs and refrigeration controllers, look for ones that use open protocols such as BACnet or Modbus.
·        Make sure these devices give you both “read” and “write” capabilities so you can change set points.
·         For easy enterprise access, choose a BMS with web services and XML capabilities.
·         Make sure the web services of the BMS allow both read and write capabilities.
·      Be sure the BMS supplier provides the XML dictionary and definitions of web services to anyone, including competitors.

 
This Artical published on April 2019 at Safe secure Magazine.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Electronic Access Control Systems: A Global Strategic Business Report

Global Electronic Access Control Systems Market to Reach US$6.0 Billion by 2015, According to New Report by Global Industry Analysts, Inc.

GIA announces the release of a comprehensive global report on Electronic Access Control Systems. Although the prolonged severity of the recent economic slowdown, and depressed key end-use sectors have elicited decline in value sales for electronic access control systems (EACS), the market is nevertheless expected to recover poise in the short to medium term period to reach US$6.0 billion by 2015. Primary factors fingered to drive this growth include increasing concerns over safety and security among individuals and organizations, post recession resurgence in key end-use markets and technology developments. Robust growth in demand from developing markets, particularly Asia-Pacific also augurs well for the market.
By product, Card-Based Electronic Access control systems market continues to be the largest product segment, holding a lion’s share of the global market. Smart cards represent the largest revenue contributor to the card-based EACS market. Audio and Video-Based Electronic Access Control Systems market is the fastest growing product segment, waxing at a CAGR of about 6.8% over the analysis period Major players in the marketplace include Aiphone Co. Ltd., ASSA ABLOY AB, BIO-key, International Inc., DigitalPersona Inc, Gunnebo Ab, Hirsch Electronics Corporation, Honeywell Access Systems, Ingersoll Rand Recognition Systems Inc., Linear LLC, Imprivata® Inc., Kaba Holding AG, L-1 Identity Solutions, NAPCO Security Systems Inc., PAC International Ltd, SAFRAN Group, SecuGen Corporation, Siemens Industry USA Building Technologies, The Chamberlain Group Inc, UTC Fire & Security, Chubb Securite S.A.S, and GE Security Inc.

http://www.gobeyondsecurity.com/forum/topics/electronic-access-control